February 2007 archive

Weblog Archive

HOME

When betting on horses, take a Republican with you

BROWN HQ (Feb. 27, 2007) -- I ran across something interesting from a blog called Political Wire a couple days ago. Research shows that at extremely early stages of Democratic presidential campaigns, Democrats are particularly bad at picking who will eventually end up winning the nomination. The only times in the last eight cycles that the person polling in first place nationally a year before the primaries went on to win the nomination were for Walter Mondale in 1984 (which was kind of a given), Bill Clinton's re-election in 1996 (a given) and Al Gore in 2000 (also a given). We Dems had Ted Kennedy beating Carter in 1980 at this point, Mario Cuomo winning in '92, Gary Hart in '88, Muskie in '72, and Joe Lieberman in '04. We all know how those turned out (latent sex scandal, malaise, regular sex scandal, open mic weeping, lack of Joementum, respectively).

Meantime, Republicans almost always back their nominee early in opinion polls. Right now, that's Rudy Giuliani. On "Meet the Press," it was reported that only six candidates of any party currently have the polling popularity to win their party's nomination. For the Dems: Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John Edwards. For the Republicans: John McCain, Giuliani and just barely at the threshold, Mitt Romney. Of these, the candidates with the most negatives was Clinton. The candidate with the most positives was Giuliani. But he's a pro-choice, pro-gay rights New Yorker in the Republican party. He faces a conservative firestorm in the primaries. He's really going to test this theory. I'm not a big Clinton fan, so my party's tendency to pick the wrong horse early is good news right now. If Clinton fades, my guy Edwards or even Obama, who I also like, could rise. Or maybe even Al Gore in a late entrance, also not too terrible in my opinion. I agree that it's too early to really dive into this yet, but such interesting possibilities await us.


Oscars clean up the mess

BROWN HQ (Feb. 26, 2007) -- I have little to offer a conversation about the Academy Awards, but I did watch and now acknowledge that -- as tedious as the TV program might be -- the Oscars are a full-fledged cultural institution. Last night, Hollywood took care of business ... providing a full pardon to Jennifer Hudson for being voted off "American Idol," rewarding Al Gore after he was robbed of the 2000 presidential election, finally giving Martin Scorsese his Oscar and selling buckets and buckets of moisturizing products during the commercial breaks.

This morning the reviews ranged from tepid to harsh for host Ellen DeGeneres. I thought she did fine -- even got a couple of big laughs at the Brown house. It reminded me of last year when I liked Jon Stewart as the Oscar host but the critics hated him. I should talk; I actually liked David Letterman as Oscar host back in '95 or whenever that was. Actually, the critics hate all Oscar hosts who aren't the reanimated corpses of Johnny Carson or Bob Hope. The whole program is designed to look bad on TV, somehow infuriate both red staters and social elites, and then pin the whole mess on the poor bastard they hired to host the thing. No one is ever again going to be a widespread hit as Oscar host. Either they'll be "too boring" or they'll go "too far."

"The Departed " is a fine picture, so kudos to them. I liked that "Little Miss Sunshine" won the Best Original Screenplay award. Hadn't seen most of the others, but I'm sure they'll be on IFC when I'm home sick hopped up on cold medication at some point in the future. That's the best time to watch art films. Should be fun.


Modern politics know no season

(This is my Sunday, Feb. 25, 2007 Hibbing Daily Tribune column.)

2007 is young. I’m still writing 2006 on some of my checks. Even so, the 2008 political season has already arrived.

It’s no secret that elections begin and are often decided long before Election Day, but this is absolutely insane. For one thing, 2008 is a historical rarity – a year when both major political parties have wide open races for the presidential nomination. Usually there’s either an incumbent or a quasi-incumbent Vice President. And, since we’ve crafted a system where the only real way to win elections is to raise a lot of money, getting out early is essential to a candidate’s fundraising credibility.

So now we have two dozen big name candidates for president and even the U.S. Senate race here in Minnesota is underway with Al Franken and Mike Ciresi running on the Democratic side and a well-funded Republican incumbent, Norm Coleman, already making plans. This got me thinking. How would some of our more prominent political leaders of the past hold up under modern lights?

George Washington: He had many sets of false teeth made from anything from wood, to whale bone, to household objects. That’s not something that plays well on HDTV, noble statesman or not.

Thomas Jefferson: Had slaves and had babies with slaves. Add with him all the other presidents who had slaves. Also, was reported to have a falsetto voice that would have been mocked on SNL.

Abraham Lincoln: He had lost a Senate race and had only served in Illinois legislature when elected. He suffered from depression and was very moody. He was perhaps our greatest president and was the only leader that could have saved the union at that time, but wouldn’t have held up on “Hardball.” Like Jefferson, his voice was nothing like the president’s from “Independence Day.”

Theodore Roosevelt: His rough and ready persona makes for great history, but his over the top gestures and boastful speeches would have put him in the same category as Howard “The Scream” Dean in this modern age.

Franklin Roosevelt: When he was president, he didn’t have to explain that the disability that kept in a wheelchair wouldn’t keep him from doing his job. He didn’t have nightly news anchors saying things like, “Will America accept a disabled president?” He likely would have struggled in today’s political climate and might never have been president.

Harry Truman: One of the underestimated figures in American history, Truman became president because of a convention selection process that made him Vice President, a process that no longer exists. Later, he was expected to lose the 1948 election so badly that not a single well-known political pundit in the country predicted he could win. He worked in a day when the speeches actually mattered, though, and Truman won because of a coast-to-coast railroad campaign that blindsided his opponent. Today’s voter: “What’s a whistle-stop?”

Dwight Eisenhower: He rode the fence too long before deciding to jump in the ’52 contest. In today’s political world, the nomination would have been locked up by the time he announced his campaign.

John Kennedy: He was the last president elected under the old “boss” system. He would have struggled in the Iowa caucuses and South Carolina primary.

Richard Nixon: He never would have been president because he lost in 1960 and couldn’t even win a governor’s race in California. He would have been cable news analyzed right out of the race.

Jimmy Carter: An unknown Georgia governor was the antidote to Watergate in 1976, but he would have lacked the funding to compete against a bigger name with more money.

Even Bill Clinton was able to come from behind to win the Democratic nomination in 1992. Today, candidates with his then-level of funding and experience are considered “second tier” and would be ignored. Reagan and Bush 41 might have still made it, but their campaigns started much later and cost much less, so we may never know. In truth, George W. Bush is the first president in a modern era of non-stop campaigning.

So if all these historical figures would be unable to lead in modern times, what kinds of leaders are we getting now? We get reasonably good looking leaders who find new ways to appease 51 percent of the people. We get people who try to be spontaneous and bold only when focus groups tell them to.

One easy thing to do amid the early 2008 skirmishing would be to check out of the debate. But that would also be the wrong thing to do. Get involved, if only to educate yourself on the candidates. Consider what you want from your leaders and encourage candidates who represent your ideals. The trouble with this never ending cycle is that it causes people to stop paying attention. That’s exactly what powerful people want you to do.

More columns



Brown on the air -- Saturday, Feb. 24

BROWN HQ (Feb.23, 2007) -- I'll be on KAXE Saturday morning with a radio essay about the call for statewide and local workplace smoking bans. "Between You and Me" with Heidi Holtan is doing a call-in show about the topic and I'm chiming in. It's a hot button issue up north and should make for an interesting show. The same piece ran as my Sunday column a couple weeks ago in the Hibbing Daily Tribune. My Sunday column is about the early political season and some of the historical implications of having a late 2008 election start early in 2007. Stay tuned! Have a great Friday and rest of the weekend!

Modern journalism: in summary

BROWN HQ (Feb. 22, 2007) -- Today's "Dilbert" cartoon by Scott Adams pretty much sums up the state of local and perhaps even some forms of national journalism. As a former and short lived daily newspaper editor, this was almost too close to home.
 


Dylan Days taking shape

BROWN HQ (Feb. 21, 2007) -- One of my many side projects is starting to loom big on the horizon. Dylan Days doesn't start until May 23, but we're putting final touches on our schedule and will start the full scale media push in less than a month. As I said last month, our feature concert is Maria Muldaur on Saturday night, May 26. Our literary night speaker is Barton Sutter, author of "Cold Comfort" and three time Minnesota Book Award winner. He's also poet laureate of Duluth.

New for 2007:
Keep your eyes on www.dylandays.com for more information. We're still taking entries for the songwriter's contest, the writing/poetry contest and art contest.


Graphic designers will determine '08 outcome

BROWN HQ (Feb. 19, 2007) -- In honor of President's Day, I'll make the following observations about the fast-growing 2008 presidential candidate scrum. This next race will be a banner year for presidential candidate logos and website design. First it was Tom Vilsack and his "V for Vendetta" motif. While not matching Vilsack's "articulate tax preparer" persona, it certainly gets liberal blood pumping. Then John Edwards gave us the "One Corps" theme, with a website that makes it sound like we're signing up for the foreign legion. Kudos to him for selling bumper stickers that simply say "e," hearkening George W. Bush's popular "W" stickers. It takes guts to say that a single letter from your name is all people need to know who you are. Hillary Clinton is apparently just campaigning on her first name, which is perhaps more realistic. Edwards couldn't do that since there are more Johns in politics than there are in a downtown brothel. (I can't even figure out the math on politicians named John who are in the same brothel). Hillary's website is a bit more "old school," though, with the red, white and blue. She's going to need to step it up if she wants to keep her perceived lead in the polls. Republican front runner John McCain's web site and logo looks like that of a corporation that James Bond would have to fight. Only I think McCain would probably catch Bond before beating him senseless and feeding him to sharks (and he'd wait to make sure the killer fish swallowed every last bite). Barack Obama's logo hearkens hope, the heartland and the letter "O" all in one contained image -- not an easy task. Other big name candidates like Rudy Giuliani and Mitt Romney have fairly standard websites, but they are still waiting to unveil their non-exploratory logos. Truly, 2008 will be a bold step forward for graphic design in politics. Too bad logos don't provide health care coverage or produce clean, renewable energy.
 

Al Franken in Nashwauk

BROWN HQ (Feb. 17, 2007) -- Al Franken kicked off his Senate campaign in Nashwauk Friday afternoon as he spoke and met with voters at the AFSCME Council 65 union hall. I was one of about 200 people who crammed into the small conference room to see what the author, radio host and longtime comedian had to say. I got the strong sense before Franken arrived that everyone in the room was suspending judgment to see and hear how Franken held up as a candidate.

We're 21 months away from the 2008 election, so it's very early. At this early stage in the game, I am giving Franken a B+ for his speech at Nashwauk. He came across as very likable and sincere, but also appeared just a little nervous in the tight quarters of the union hall. I think that only added to the sense that he was sincere, however. I have mulled here on the blog and in conversations with other politicos that I worry about Franken's enormous file of off-color comedy bits and strongly worded statements that could be used against him. I am modifying my analysis to say that Franken could make this work if he remains true to his personality and style. If he starts to act like the consultants got to him, he will get killed. But if he remains sincere and smart, I think that will provide a nice contrast to Norm Coleman's slick and smooth political opportunism. As a Democrat, I am facing some facts about this race. Some of the best office holders in Minnesota (Tim Walz, Betty McCollum, et. al.) aren't interested in the seat. Coleman will have a lot of money and will be favored at first. Franken is right on DFL issues (putting universal health care and renewable energy initiatives first) and can articulate those issues well. So, he was a comedian ... would we rather he was a lawyer? I'm saying it here, and hoping that my long streak of DFL primary bad luck ends with it, that I'm warming to a Franken candidacy and he just might be my candidate for '08.



Books lift winter doldrums

(This is my weekly Hibbing Daily Tribune column for Sunday, Feb. 18. It also aired Saturday, Feb. 17, on KAXE's "Between You and Me" and will air again on the Monday, Feb. 19, KAXE morning show).

The book industry revolves around “summer reads,” books that people wouldn’t have time to read during the busy school year but would gladly lap up under the summer sun. I don’t get this. Summer – the real summer when it probably won’t snow – only lasts three months in northern Minnesota. That’s when you’re supposed to get outside to work off the winter’s worth of macaroni and cheese, pastries and other soul foods stored in your lumpy midsection. I barely read the mail during the summer because cheese is so good and winter is so long.

I have found the lengthy cold nights of January and February to be just right for reading. At the beginning of the year I finished “Truman,” the David McCullough biography of our 33rd President. I was most impressed with the former president’s personal habits. Truman grew up in a place – Jackson County in northwestern Missouri – with enormous weather variables. As a young man, he claimed to have read every book in the Independence Public Library. He was also the last president to keep a thorough journal and write countless personal letters to almost everyone in his inner circle. Harry Truman spent a lot of winter nights with books and letters.

Inspired by Harry, I spent January finally reading “The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People” by Stephen Covey. I know this is an older book now. Inspirational office posters that quote from this book are already yellowing on the wall above some guy who is playing minesweeper on his computer. But I hadn’t read it yet, even though I use the Franklin/Covey planner.

I am a planner junkie. My planner is on me like a shadow and that's how I like it. If I've talked business, politics or major personal news with you in the past six years your name is in my book and indexed by the date we spoke. I also keep story and essay ideas stored by date. I have gone six years using the planner without any training or reading the book, until just last month.

The planner system I've developed is kind of like a Frankenstein creature made from stuff found in Covey's garage bin. If it could speak, it would probably say, "Kill me." One day recently, for instance, was so busy that I not only filled out the 26 "Prioritized Task List" spaces in my planner with a ranked to-do list, but also used the eight additional spaces under "Daily Tracker" and even six more spots in the "Daily Notes" area. Forty tasks!

Worse yet, despite what I read in the “Seven Habits,” I included no spirituality, no personal victories, no exercise on the list. I even wrote down "Watch 'Lost’" as a task. A TV show is my only personal enrichment task for the day. Covey would so freak out on me.

But I did learn something in the book and finally realize why so many middle aged corporate types use the word “synergize.” I thought they got that from Dilbert.

I have built up a healthy stack of reading material now and we’re entering the best time of year to catch up on it. I notice that in my to-read stack of five books, only one is fiction – “Nature Girl,” the latest from my favorite writer Carl Hiassen’s. I read somewhere that men trend toward nonfiction while women trend toward fiction. One quote implied that men can’t handle the truth found in fiction. That’s an interesting theory. I suppose I’d agree if I read the books many men in my family seek, car guides and instructional manuals on how to reload ammunition. But Harry Truman’s story has only taught me that I have yet to adopt the kind of personal discipline that got him through some of the most difficult trials a human can face. Covey’s book only reminded me that watching “Deal or No Deal” will not make me smarter.

No, I found real truths in my winter nonfiction list. I have a lot of thinking, and reading, to do before the warm summer months welcome me back outside.

More columns


Brown on the air -- Saturday, Feb. 17

BROWN HQ (Feb. 16, 2007) -- As usual, an essay of mine will appear on KAXE's "Between You and Me" with Heidi Holtan Saturday morning. The show airs between 10 a.m. and noon and my piece will probably be near the beginning. This week's show topic is winter book recommendations. I'm talking about trends in winter reading habits. Don't worry, it's much more exciting than that sentence makes it sound. (I hope). You can listen online at www.kaxe.org or on 91.7 FM in northern Minnesota. The same piece will serve as my Sunday column in the Hibbing Daily Tribune. I'll post it this weekend.


Al Franken is in the hunt

BROWN HQ (Feb. 15, 2007) -- Yesterday, comedian and author Al Franken entered the race for the 2008 DFL nomination for U.S. Senate. He will face an uphill battle, first for the nomination and then for the full scale battle against incumbent Republican Sen. Norm Coleman. State DFLers know and like Franken, but also remain skeptical that he'll be able to switch gears from social commentary to being an effective politician. They also know that his style might not play well with the middle-of-the-roaders that liked Amy Klobuchar so much. He'll need to prove he can be effective against opponents who drag up his old risque comedy bits from SNL and his more provocative statements in his books and radio broadcasts. If he can do those things, he would be a strong candidate. If he can't, he's road meat and DFLers must find someone else. (And please, God, not Mike Ciresi).

Norm Coleman is a wily shape shifter who would tough for anyone to beat. He almost never runs against the wind. As mad as he makes people who watch him closely, it's almost impossible to get casual voters to share that anger. A SurveyUSA poll taken recently shows Coleman up 57-36 on Franken (thought, to be fair, it is WAY to early to get a completely valid number). That does, however, match Coleman's approval rating and shows that even in a political climate that favors Democrats in a state that leans Democratic, he will a difficult mark.

I'll get a chance to see Franken in action tomorrow (Friday) as he does a meet and greet at the Nashwauk AFSCME union hall. It's events like these that will shape how he is seen by Democrats. It is significant that Franken told reporters he will abide by the DFL endorsement process. That always wins favor among the faithful and will help him. I've always liked Franken as a writer; we'll see if he has what it takes as a candidate.

AL FRANKEN FOR SENATE MEET AND GREET
When: 3 p.m. on Friday, Feb. 16
Where: AFSCME Union Hall, downtown Nashwauk, Minn.


They're calling for my blood now

BROWN HQ (Feb. 14, 2007) -- Last night someone called asking me for my blood. It was one of those hired calling centers working on behalf of the local blood center. It was about 9 p.m. and I was right in the middle of some heavy work on my book project. This nice gal calls up and asks if I would consider donating blood. "Over the phone?" I asked. "Yes, well, actually we'll make an appointment for you right now," she said. It was an unexpected question. I actually floundered for several seconds making noises like "aaaaahhh" and "hmmmm." I said I needed to think about it. This was a cold call asking for bodily fluids. I'm used to telemarketers asking for money or political support, but not blood. "Can you send me something first, so I can think about it?" I asked. Remember, I was in the middle of something when she asked for my blood. She didn't have the power to mail anything. I made more indescript noises and took a pass. She tried to work on me, but I just wasn't in the mood to do it that way. Today it's blood over the phone, what will be tomorrow's fluid de jour?

Nobody gets my blood over the phone. If I'm not willing to buy stuff or donate over the phone, why would I say OK to blood? I feel kind of bad about it. Yes, we should all donate blood if we're healthy. No, I haven't donated blood. But you've got to build up your case before you ask for it. I just hope this isn't bad karma.


Valentine's Day is coming

BROWN HQ (Feb. 13, 2007) -- Valentine's Day is, for many, a day of obligation and for others a cruel reminder that they are not in a relationship. There are those who love this holiday, but they are busy right now gathering rose petals and getting tattoos that say "I will love you, Kevin, forever and ever." (or perhaps something less wordy and more affordable). For me, it's not a real holiday. I don't get a day off of work and the government will deliver the mail.

That's right, folks, Valentine's Day is here (tomorrow, anyway) and I hope by now you've found the perfect gift for your loved one (the one that says, "our relationship is in no way symbolically withering away because I'm giving you sweatpants"). If you don't have a traditional "loved one," (except for your family and friends ... and, remember, THEY DON'T COUNT ON WEDNESDAY) well, this day will serve only as a loud reminder that you are statistically more likely to die alone in your empty home or apartment, with only your eventual smell to remind your neighbors that, until 1-3 months ago, someone lived there.

Fear not. No matter what situation you're in, the Internet is here to help. I gave the offerings at MSNBC.com a once over, and saw headlines like "Cook this romantic scallop dish." What is it, exactly, about scallops that make them romantic? No spine? From the sea? Hard to say, but sufficed to say there are many gems out there for the desperate Valentinean.


Smoking ban laws up for votes

BROWN HQ (Feb. 13, 2007) -- St. Louis County -- the geographically largest and most Iron Rangish county in the state -- considers a county wide smoking ban at its board meeting today. The Minnesota state senate considered a statewide ban in committee yesterday, with a vote expected soon. I wrote a column in favor of a statewide workplace smoking ban on Sunday. It appears that, with the exception of a few local leaders, most of our state officials from the Range are going to vote against or otherwise water down the language of the smoking ban. This isn't surprising. The ban will still pass in some form, though, and in 10 years we'll all wonder why we waited so long. A majority of the American population now lives under a public smoking ban. I say again, it's not a personal choice issue; it's a public health issue. Stay tuned.

UPDATE (Feb. 14): St. Louis County is holding public hearings on a tough version of the smoking ban that includes bars and resorts. It appears from the tone of the debate that they have the votes to pass this version now, but are waiting to hear from the public. Meantime, Carlton County -- to our south -- passed a strict workplace smoking ban that will cover bars and restaurants.


The energy future on the Iron Range

BROWN HQ (Feb. 12, 2007) -- Believe me. I don't want this to become an "energy issues" blog. That's going to get old fast. But I was interested to hear on KAXE this morning that, by the end of the year, Minnesota Power will have 100 megawatts of wind generated power from 54 turbines in North Dakota on its grid. MP currently sells about 42 megawatts of wind power. Spokesman Eric Olson was on with Scott Hall on the KAXE morning show today. Olson pointed out that this is not "baseline" power because wind power can't be counted on 24/7 (sometimes there is no wind). However, it is a useful and obviously very clean way to generate power at peak times. Most people understand that you can't rely on wind exclusively, but I do think many in the power industry understate the ability of wind power to perform well on the market. I think it'd be a much better use of resources on the Iron Range to pursue wind power generation on the tips of our tallest mine dumps than to take enormous risks on 1,000 megawatt coal plants, gasified or not. I understand the need for baseline power, but with the constant and unchanging trend away from carbon based power it would be foolish to overbuild a expensive facility that uses coal. To borrow from "Field of Dreams": If you build it; it will close. As wind turbines and transmission lines become more efficient, the old arguments against wind power fall away.

If the Range really wants to invest in a big experiment that creates jobs up north, we should invest in biomass and wind facilities. We are not close to major population centers (the customers) or coal mines (the fuel). By generating cheap, clean power with our natural resources (wind, trees) we will be making a logical move that fits our region. The best choice, naturally, would be to generate power from the steamy, hot promises of energy lobbyists and prospectors. But if we did that there'd be no one to secure sweetheart deals for the plant. An unfortunate Catch-22. Looks like biomass and wind, after all.

Funny Ha-Ha

BROWN HQ (Feb. 11, 2007) -- On Saturday night I did my stand up comedy act at the HCC Community Showcase. It went better than I expected. We got a few laughs and I think I accomplished my goal of not being the worst act in the show. I still doubt that my comedy efforts will represent any sort of long term career goal, but it's nice to know that I can hold an audience for seven minutes.


Funny Not Ha-Ha

BROWN HQ (Feb. 11, 2007) -- Those who follow Iron Range economic development know that there are several projects on the horizon right now, all of which have extensive ties to legislative action and public agencies either for funding or permitting. For the longest time, public officials and private backers mentioned the proposed direct-reduced iron steel plant in Nashwauk (MSI) and the proposed coal gasification power plant in Taconite (Excelsior Energy's Mesaba Project) in the same breathe. Then, a couple months ago, when a friend of this blogger -- Rep. Tom Anzelc -- proposed a bonding bill to fund infrastructure for JUST the steel plant, that talk faded for a while.

This morning, in the Grand Rapids Herald-Review, that talk is back in a letter to the editor from former State Sen. and current RAMS director Ron Dicklich. He's saying, among other things, that the steel plant may come to need the power that could be created at the proposed Mesaba plant. He says Xcel -- one of the state's big power producers -- can't fulfill the steel plant's electricity needs. I don't have any evidence to dispute that, but he also doesn't mention if Minnesota Power -- another major power producer and broker -- has the power in their load to fill the need. He and MP have a long history of disagreement so this is not surprising. I do believe that steel plant officials have said that the power to run the plant will exist in the grid, even if it doesn't all come from Xcel and even without the Excelsior plant.

So, why is Dicklich suddenly returning to the rhetoric that the fate of the steel plant rests on the fate of the Micheletti/Jorgensen coal gas plant? I don't have a great answer to that. It's a Sunday puzzler. Are backers of the Mesaba Project plant trying to recover the head of steam they lost during the PUC hearings late last year? Is this indicative of a legislative push for Excelsior funding that might come? Like many, I anxiously await the state PUC's decision on the Excelsior power purchase agreement later this month or next. That will answer a lot of these questions.

UPDATE (Feb. 12): Wait a minute. All this year, Excelsior officials have been saying that their rates would have to be higher because this was experimental clean technology. That's why MP, Xcel and the MN Chamber opposed the power purchase agreement. If the rates HAVE to be higher, then why is it to Minnesota Steel's advantage to buy their power from there? The argument that both projects need each other is only true in the case of the coal gas plant. The steel plant would be able to run just fine off hydro power from Manitoba via Xcel. It's cheaper AND cleaner.



Workplace smoking ban is overdue

(This is my Sunday, Feb. 11 column for the Hibbing Daily Tribune. It will air later this month as an essay on KAXE)

I’m a freedom guy. I have a wooden plaque carved with the First Amendment to the Constitution on the wall in my home office. Conservatives would bristle to hear that I am a card-carrying member of the ACLU. I support freedoms even when they are unpopular. I oppose any constitutional amendment that would ban the burning of the American flag, not because I support burning flags but because I support the freedoms represented by the flag. I oppose laws banning lawful people from owning guns. I oppose controls on what can be said in the media. I oppose the concealment of what our government does behind closed doors. I oppose government spying on any citizen without just cause. You may disagree, but enjoy the fact that you have the right to disagree.

So when the issue of statewide smoking ban comes up this legislative session, as it has, one might expect me to again cite freedom of choice in opposing the ban. But this issue is not about freedom of choice; it’s about public health. As such, I support a public smoking ban in all Minnesota workplaces and you should too.

In as much as possible, people should be free to make personal choices. You may choose between a greasy burger and a salad, maxing out your credit card or pinching pennies. As such, people must also be subject to the consequences. That’s why we shouldn’t ban the sale of tobacco products. However, unlike using alcohol, using tobacco affects other people.

Government buildings have already banned smoking because of the liability of secondhand smoke. It’s been decades since office buildings have seen the clouds of smoke they once knew. Since the various agencies in charge of regulating workplace safety already impose standards that most people accept, this would simply be a modern addition to those basic rules. Workplace discrimination is unacceptable. Unsafe workplaces are unacceptable. Secondhand smoke, when preventable, is unacceptable too.

The state smoking ban idea is a public health issue, not an attempt to control what people do. You may smoke in your houses, your cars, outside, or in places where others have the reasonable choice to avoid the smoke.

Local lawmakers have been cool, if not outright opposed to a restaurant smoking ban for many years. They have their reasons, usually related to freedom of choice. This year, for the first time, many of them are now acknowledging that a restaurant smoking ban is likely. This is a positive step.

Passing a total workplace smoking ban is not an easy thing to do. Many businesses, especially bars, will say that a statewide smoking ban is going to harm their businesses. The evidence just doesn’t back that up, however. What has been found in states that have already passed bans is that, after a short period of adjustment, establishments return to identical or even improved levels of patronage in a smoke-free environment. What is often overlooked is that new customers will often replace smoking customers.

You can’t change the human desire to go out and have a good time with friends or enjoy a meal in a restaurant. You can change the need to smoke while doing so. We live in a changing world and a workplace smoking ban is overdue.

I’m not going to tug at your heartstrings about the effects of secondhand smoke. Almost no one disagrees that second hand smoke is bad for public health and causes preventable diseases. It’s time for public laws to reflect this public fact.

Right now efforts are being made to pass a smoking ban in St. Louis County. That’s a good start. The state legislature is also expected to visit the issue this year. Gov. Tim Pawlenty has said he would sign some form of a statewide smoking ban in public places. A workplace smoking ban would best be handled at the state level. It’s not an easy thing to do, but it’s the right thing to do.

More columns


First failed kiss

BROWN HQ (Feb. 10, 2007) -- For those of you who can't or couldn't hear my essay on KAXE this morning, here is the text of the piece. When I get some bandwidth and free time, I might put these essays up as audio files. Just don't hold your breathe.

HOST INTRO: We’re talking about the first kiss in honor of Valentine’s Day. KAXE contributor Aaron Brown shares his perspective.

AB: For a modest Midwesterner, kissing is the ultimate breach of personal space. Don’t get me wrong. It’s fun and far more hygienic than you’d think. But the first time one person gets it in their head to lock lips with another person, there’s a lot of pressure on getting it right.

That’s why people gather around on days like Valentine’s Day, anniversaries and slumber parties to recount the ordeal of their first kiss. For some, the experience is magical. For others, frightening. Some look back with laughter, others with longing. Those of us who watch TV might have seen a Victoria’s Secret ad in which the lingerie models tell stories about THEIR first kisses. Their stories were so sweet and innocent that you’d think you were hearing a group of church ladies … only church ladies usually wear tops. I think the universal quality of the first kiss story is what the Madison Avenue folks were after with the underwear ad. I suspect that most of these gals’ first kisses were with a modeling agent shortly after his helicopter landed in their remote Ukrainian village. That assertion, however, remains theoretical.

For the record, I married the first person I kissed successfully. I like to think that means I’m just that good. But for today’s purposes, I am left thinking about another experience. My first attempted kiss, which was not successful.

The world of literature could not survive without unrequited love. If everybody got the girl or guy or sometimes both, there would be no good poems, novels or songs to go around. During my high school years, I endured my share of unrequited love and in one failed conquest I drove 500 miles to tell a girl that I wanted to be more than friends. It was a long three days that could be summarized by the final 30 seconds. I leaned in for the kiss of true love, what was to be my first kiss, only I had no idea what I was doing. Do you aim for the lips? Is this all on me, or is she supposed to do something. Is she even remotely into this? With a flourish, she did the dreaded quick head turn – straight out of a shampoo commercial – as I barreled in … for the hug. You can’t rewind a hug. It was over. Wide right. Shanked it.

I got over it and went on to marry someone who kissed back, but I also still remember the occasion. And I still wonder for every first kiss how many failed kisses lie in the graveyard of unrequited love? Could they have ever been as wonderful as they were supposed to be?

HOST OUTRO: Aaron Brown is an instructor at Hibbing Community College, a columnist for the Hibbing Daily Tribune and a contributor to KAXE.


Brown on the air

BROWN HQ (Feb. 9, 2007) -- I'm on the air tomorrow (Saturday) morning with an essay that will air on KAXE's "Between You and Me" on 91.7 FM in northern Minnesota and streaming online at www.kaxe.org. The show's topic this week is "First Kiss" in honor of the upcoming Valentine's Day. I wrote a piece talking about the great expectations of a first kiss and the problems when your first attempted kiss fails. And by "your" I actually mean "my."  For a glimpse at young Brown's botched love life, tune in. The show starts at 10 a.m. and Heidi Holtan tells me I'm batting leadoff. I'll be in Bigfork judging a speech meet when the essay airs. Then Saturday night I'm on stage doing "comedy" at the HCC Community Showcase. See below for ticket info. Sorry for all the plugging. Also, give blood and help kids do better in school. There, now I feel better. 

Did ya' ever notice...

BROWN HQ (Feb. 8, 2007) -- I mentioned this in passing yesterday, but this Saturday, Feb. 10, I will be doing a stand up act in the HCC Theatre Community Showcase. I'll be one of about 20 acts ranging from music to poetry to juggling. I haven't done comedy on a stage since my senior year of high school, but the director Mike Ricci -- a friend of mine -- asked me and for some reason I agreed. I still feel funny telling people I'm doing a comedy bit. It's like when the chubby guy from accounting tells you he's an Ultimate Fighter. Many of my columns and essays are humorous but I've never been able to convince myself that I'm a comedian. I've got about seven minutes of material written. It's "column" funny, but only time and an audience packed with people waiting to see their children sing will tell.

SEE THE SHOW! Even if I tank, the money goes to the HCC Theatre Department, which is presenting Disney's "Beauty and the Beast" this spring. This is a very large production and, even though we're a small town operation, Mike doesn't lower any standards.

HCC THEATRE COMMUNITY SHOWCASE
Saturday, Feb. 10
7 p.m., HCC Theatre
23rd St. Entrance in Hibbing, Minn.
Tickets are $10, with proceeds going to HCC Theatre. Buy them at the door or reserve a seat by calling Mike at 218-262-7377.


I am butchering the '7 habits'

BROWN HQ (Feb. 7, 2007) -- I am a planner junkie. My planner is on me like a shadow and that's how I like it. If I've talked business, politics or major personal news with you in the past six years your name is in my book and indexed by the date we spoke. I also keep story and essay ideas stored by date. I use the Franklin-Covey planner system, which is "fueled" by Stephen Covey's "The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People." I have gone six years using the planner without any training or reading the book, until just this month. The system of personal organization, time management and goal-setting I've developed is kind of like a bastard Frankenstein creature made from stuff found in Covey's garage bin. If it could speak, it would probably say, "Kill me." Today, for instance, is a very busy day for me. I've not only filled out the 26 "Prioritized Task List" spaces in my planner with a ranked to-do list, but also used the eight additional spaces under "Daily Tracker" and even six more spots in the "Daily Notes" area. Forty tasks! And I have no spirituality, no personal victories, no exercise on the list. I even wrote down "Watch 'Lost' season premiere" as a task. A TV show is my only personal enrichment task for the day. Covey would so freak out on me. I know this because I finally read his book for a leadership training program I'm in at work. I definitely recognize the seven habits, and am living most or some of all seven, but I am off track on some of the key habits. I'm so damn entrenched in my Frankensystem now, that it's going to be hard to change.

Busy week ahead. Classes, Dylan Days and online meetings at the college today. Recording a radio essay for Saturday tomorrow. More classes and Christina has an ultrasound appointment on Friday. Saturday I'm judging a speech meet in Bigfork and, swear to God, I am doing a stand-up comedy routine during a community variety show Saturday night. Holy crap. It's written and it's hovering right around "funny" levels, but it's one of those deals where if I don't get an hour of rehearsal before Saturday the stink will clear the building during the performance.

The Gore Situation

BROWN HQ (Feb. 6, 2007) -- Since I've been commenting on all the other presidential politics gossip, I'll comment on this idea, too. What if -- after winning a Best Documentary Oscar for "An Inconvenient Truth" as is expected -- Al Gore said in his acceptance speech, "You know what, global climate change is too important ... I'm running for President." WHAM! Instant media storm. Hillary, Obama and my guy Edwards are put on camera going, "hummina, hummina, hummina." (How do you spell hummina, hummina, hummina? This represents my best guess).

It's an interesting idea. Gore's denials and behind-the-scenes dismantling of his political committees leads one to believe otherwise, but people keep mentioning his name. He's got more gravitas than anyone else on the Democratic side -- even a bit more than Bill Richardson or Hillary.

When I was writing editorials for the Hibbing Daily Tribune, I wrote a piece saying that it was wise for Al Gore NOT to run in the 2004 election. I still stand by that. A Gore run then would have been full of vengeance and more "consultant dictated" policy speeches. But this year, Gore could truly run the campaign he should have run in 2000, focusing on energy independence and planning for life in 2050. I still like some of the other candidates and a Gore nomination is not assured, but he would certainly add something to the race.


Common cold a blessing in disguise

(This is my Hibbing Daily Tribune column for Sunday, Feb. 4, 2007. A version also appears, or appeared, Saturday morning, Feb. 3, on 91.7 KAXE for the "Between You and Me" program with Heidi Holtan.)

Hi, my name is Aaron and I’m a workaholic. I have been carrying my day planner to family functions for seven years. And, though few of us like to admit it, workaholics like me have a different perspective on the common cold than most people. For one thing, I don’t allow myself to be sick all that often. I’ll fight through stuffy or runny noses, coughs or aches because I’ve got things to do. Even when my voice sounds that of a 75-year-old tobacco lobbyist, I will be at the keyboard, in the classroom and on the phone.

Only when I get the hallucinogenic head colds – ganja colds I call them – do I stay home. In truth, those days, as medicated and miserable as they might be, are some of the only true vacation days I really take. They are the only days I eat soup on the couch, watch old movies on dusty VHS tapes from the basement, turn off the computer and snap shut my planner until the next day. Sure, I have other days off, but I always have things to do. Nothing suppresses that urge more than disease though, and in a strange way I enjoy my annual knock-me-down-flat cold.

You have to respect viruses. They are the Hell’s Angels of microscopic organisms. They’ll roll in and, when they do, you best just let them finish what they started. Only when they run their course can your body expel them. Just like a biker gang, they’ll own the place until they run out of glass to break and people to stab with the shards.

I do some of the traditional cold remedies – chicken soup and cran-raspberry juice – but I prefer to medicate myself and fall asleep in front of visually appealing but plot-light movies. The more abstract the movie the better. There’s something about watching “2001: A Space Odyssey” when you are hopped up on cold pills that improves the experience. Same thing with the TV show “CHiPs.” Ever see the episode where Ponch pulls over erstwhile children’s TV icon HR Puffnstuff? A swig of Nyquil is the only way that makes sense.

There’s an old “Saturday Night Live” commercial for a fake product called Hibernol. In the ad, you take Hibernol and sleep for months, while colds enter and leave your body at will, until springtime comes. If I weren’t so busy I might take Hibernol, so in that way it’s probably a good thing I’m a workaholic. Then again, when a cold seems to make the ceiling spin clockwise any medication just makes it spin counterclockwise. It won’t stop until you’ve napped.

On television we see wall to wall ads for products claiming they can stave off colds or help you go to work. It’s all garbage. When it comes to the common cold, science hasn’t found and won’t soon reach a total cure. When a knock-down cold comes your way, accept your fate. It’s a blessing in disguise. Stay home for a day and then go back to work. A cold is nature’s Taser gun. Don’t fight the Taser. Don’t try to work when your head is throbbing and office supplies on your desk seem like they’re waving at you. If you do, everything you accomplish will end up looking like John Nash’s workshop in “A Perfect Mind” anyway. Just sit back and heal. Those virus bikers will run out of drugs, money and gas soon. When they do, our immune system will pull up in the paddy wagon.

Get well soon.

More columns


Super weekend kicks off

BROWN HQ (Feb. 2, 2007) -- I'm not normally much for pop culture events, but the Super Bowl is one of a few exceptions. Super Bowl Sunday is a holiday, for all practical purposes, and the Browns are active participants. A few friends are coming out to watch the game, we're picking up some take out pizza and good times will be had by all.

Though we are Minnesotans, we are pulling for the Bears in this one. Christina was born in Illinois and the Bears are, after all, the classic Midwestern team. For the last ten years, the real pleasure in watching the Super Bowl has not been the game, but the fun in mocking the halftime show. With Prince slated to headline this year's show we should have plenty of snide comments to make. You know, one of these years they'll book somebody with current relevence to sing at the Super Bowl. I swear, in three years they'll be booking Smash Mouth or Chumbawumba. It's like they base their decisions on five year old copies of Teen People they find in the recycle bin.

Enjoy the weekend! It will be the coldest weekend of the year where we live, so stay warm and enjoy some safe fun.


Aqua Teen Hunger Force 1, Boston 0, terrorists 1,000,000

BROWN HQ (Feb. 1, 2007) -- When I was young, my family would gather around every time a cable network would unveil the new season of an irreverent cartoon show. We'd make light up signs of a character from the show raising its middle finger. Then, mom and dad would drive us around town, instructing us to put the signs in high traffic locations. Oh, the times we had!

OK, I'm kidding. We didn't have cable. But it was a time of innocence in a pre-9/11 world.

By now you've probably seen the news that officials in Boston are furious over the Cartoon Network's publicity stunt, in which lighted signs featuring the pixelated aliens from "Aqua Teen Hunger Force" were posted across major U.S. cities. The stunt was largely ignored in all the other cities, but in Boston law enforcement called out every law enforcement agency they could. Officers in chemical suits removed the signs with what looked to be tongs. Some signs were detonated. A surly looking college aged guy was arrested. News agencies broadcast the images worldwide with a digital blur over the obscene gesture.

Quicker than you could say "farce," officials were on the microphone decrying the Cartoon Network. This phrase was common: "In a post-9/11 world ..." In a post-9/11 world, they said, you can't be pulling this stuff. In a post-9/11 world, Turner Broadcasting should know better.

What a load of crap. These things were so clearly NOT bombs. The stunt had already been executed in several other cities, including New York, without declaring martial law. The Cartoon  Network and Adult Swim must be thrilled with this publicity because they made our entire anti-terrorism effort look funnier than any of their cartoons. What kind of victory can we really expect in the War on Terror if this is the cloud we're going to live under? Rhetorical question, I guess. Meantime, I'd recommend we all tune in to Adult Swim on the Cartoon Network tonight to see if Turner Broadcasting clamps down or lets "Aqua Teen Hunger Force" reap the comic rewards. If Turner clamps down, the terrorists win again.


Brown on the Air: Saturday, Feb. 3

BROWN HQ (Feb. 1, 2007) -- I've got an essay on humankind's constant struggle with the common cold airing on KAXE's "Between You and Me" this weekend, sometime between 10 a.m. and noon on Saturday morning. An extended version of the same piece will run as my Sunday column.

Blog Archive





HOME            Copyright 2007 · Aaron J. Brown